linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 bpf-next 4/9] libbpf: Allow to resolve binary path in current directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzar7H1OsjgqJ8H6R-f3DZPhhR0+KOamyt0MDNboept--A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 17:19:00 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 bpf-next 4/9] libbpf: Allow to resolve binary path
 in current directory

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 1:33 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Try to resolve uprobe/usdt binary path also in current directory,
> it's used in the test code in following changes.

nope, that's not what shell is doing, so let's not invent new rules
here. If some tests need something like that, utilize LD_LIBRARY_PATH
or even better just specify './library.so'

>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 05c4db355f28..f72115e8b7f9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -10727,17 +10727,19 @@ static const char *arch_specific_lib_paths(void)
>  /* Get full path to program/shared library. */
>  static int resolve_full_path(const char *file, char *result, size_t result_sz)
>  {
> -       const char *search_paths[3] = {};
> +       const char *search_paths[4] = {};
>         int i, perm;
>
>         if (str_has_sfx(file, ".so") || strstr(file, ".so.")) {
>                 search_paths[0] = getenv("LD_LIBRARY_PATH");
>                 search_paths[1] = "/usr/lib64:/usr/lib";
>                 search_paths[2] = arch_specific_lib_paths();
> +               search_paths[3] = ".";
>                 perm = R_OK;
>         } else {
>                 search_paths[0] = getenv("PATH");
>                 search_paths[1] = "/usr/bin:/usr/sbin";
> +               search_paths[2] = ".";
>                 perm = R_OK | X_OK;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>