[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAiNXmbep8nR6nkj@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:27:58 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
bvanassche@....org, keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
gpiccoli@...lia.com, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM6125 UFS PHY support
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:37:48AM -0300, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> On 8 March 2023 08:23:57 GMT-03:00, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> >It seems a previous version of this patch was merged almost two months
> >ago.
> >
> > 9b9e29af984c ("phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM6125 UFS PHY support")
> >
> >Not sure what failed here.
> Yes, but it received some comments regarding using v5 offsets instead
> of v3-660. I could spin off this change into a new patch if necessary.
Once a patch has been applied, you generally need to do any further
changes incrementally on top.
It seems Dmitry renamed the struct himself after the patch was applied
in this case.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists