[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230308021024.13566-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:10:24 +0800
From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To: johan+linaro@...nel.org
Cc: robdclark@...il.com, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, sean@...rly.run, airlied@...il.com,
daniel@...ll.ch, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Revert "drm/msm: Add missing check and destroy for alloc_ordered_workqueue"
On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 18:07:13 +0800, Johan Hovold wrote:
> This reverts commit 643b7d0869cc7f1f7a5ac7ca6bd25d88f54e31d0.
The commit not only adds the allocation sanity check, but also adds the
destroy_workqueue to release the allocated priv->wq.
Therefore, revert the commit will cause memory leak.
> A recent patch that tried to fix up the msm_drm_init() paths with
> respect to the workqueue but only ended up making things worse:
>
> First, the newly added calls to msm_drm_uninit() on early errors would
> trigger NULL-pointer dereferences, for example, as the kms pointer would
> not have been initialised. (Note that these paths were also modified by
> a second broken error handling patch which in effect cancelled out this
> part when merged.)
There is a check for the kms pointer to avoid NULL-pointer dereference in
the msm_drm_uninit().
> Second, the newly added allocation sanity check would still leak the
> previously allocated drm device.
The ddev is allocated by drm_dev_alloc which support automatic cleanup.
Thanks,
Jiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists