Message-ID: <CAJedcCwhk_XuMF8keGZGBTVBZSMuoQeyV_7L1H2VeT2x_vj-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:20:34 +0800
From:   Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To:     Kyrie Wu (吴晗) <Kyrie.Wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "zyytlz.wz@....com" <zyytlz.wz@....com>,
        "alex000young@...il.com" <alex000young@...il.com>,
        Bin Liu (刘彬) <bin.liu@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com" 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        "1395428693sheep@...il.com" <1395428693sheep@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] media: mtk-jpeg: Fix use after free bug due to
 uncanceled work

Hi Kyrie,

Thank you for your careful analysis and response. I still have some
areas that I don't quite understand and would like to ask for
clarification. That is, how do the function pointers for stop
streaming, initialized as mtk_jpeg_enc_stop_streaming and
mtk_jpeg_dec_stop_streaming, ensure that the worker is canceled? I
would greatly appreciate your response.

Best regards,
Zheng

Kyrie Wu (吴晗) <Kyrie.Wu@...iatek.com> 于2023年3月8日周三 10:02写道：
>
> On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 23:03 +0800, Zheng Hacker wrote:
> > The timer function was set in mtk_jpeg_probe with
> > mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work function.
> > And the worker is started in mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run.
> > There are two functions (mtk_jpeg_enc_irq and mtk_jpeg_dec_irq) which
> > may cancel the worker.
> > They are used as IRQ handler function which is saved as function
> > pointer in a variable.
> > In mtk_jpeg_probe, they are registered by devm_request_irq:
> >
> > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
> >                jpeg_irq,
> >                jpeg->variant->irq_handler,
> >                0,
> >                pdev->name, jpeg);
> >     if (ret) {
> >       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request jpeg_irq %d (%d)\n",
> >         jpeg_irq, ret);
> >       return ret;
> >     }
> >
> > However, if we remove the module without triggering the irq, the
> > worker will never be removed.
> >
> > As for the schedule, mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run and
> > mtk_jpeg_enc_device_run will start the worker.
> > The schedule invoking is quite complicated. As far as I know, the
> > invoking chain is as follows:
> >
> > v4l2_m2m_init->v4l2_m2m_device_run_work->v4l2_m2m_try_run
> >
> > the v4l2_m2m_device_run_work function is also a worker which is set
> > in
> > v4l2_m2m_init and started in
> > v4l2_m2m_schedule_next_job.
> >
> > Before calling remove function, the  mtk_jpeg_release was invoked to
> > release the related resource.
> >
> > v4l2_m2m_cancel_job will cancel the job by calling
> > m2m_dev->m2m_ops->job_abort(m2m_ctx->priv).
> >
> > But this will only cancel the current queue by
> > list_del(&m2m_dev->curr_ctx->queue);
> >
> > I think this can not cancel the posted task mentioned before. So I
> > think if mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work
> >
> > is working on, and using jpeg->m2m_dev after freeing it in
> > mtk_jpeg_remove, it will cause a UAF bug.
> >
> > static int mtk_jpeg_release(struct file *file)
> > {
> >   struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg = video_drvdata(file);
> >   struct mtk_jpeg_ctx *ctx = mtk_jpeg_fh_to_ctx(file->private_data);
> >
> >   mutex_lock(&jpeg->lock);
> >   v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&ctx->ctrl_hdl);
> >   [1] v4l2_m2m_ctx_release(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> >   v4l2_fh_del(&ctx->fh);
> >   v4l2_fh_exit(&ctx->fh);
> >   kfree(ctx);
> >   mutex_unlock(&jpeg->lock);
> >   return 0;
> > }
> >
> > void v4l2_m2m_ctx_release(struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *m2m_ctx)
> > {
> >   /* wait until the current context is dequeued from job_queue */
> >   [2] v4l2_m2m_cancel_job(m2m_ctx);
> >
> >   vb2_queue_release(&m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx.q);
> >   vb2_queue_release(&m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx.q);
> >
> >   kfree(m2m_ctx);
> > }
> >
> > Note that all of this is static analysis, which may be false
> > positive.
> > Feel free to tell me if there is something I've missed.
> >
> > Regard,
> > Zheng
>
> Dear Zheng,
>
> You set up an application scenario:
> cpu1 is using the mtk-jpeg driver and timeout work has been scheduled.
> At the same time cpu0 wanted to remove the mtk-jpeg driver, which
> caused the UAF bug.
> I wonder if such an irrational application scenario could exist. This
> scenario, as you described, not only leads to the problems you
> mentioned, but also to output&capture memory leaks and unreleased
> resources, such as spinlock.
> Typically, if we want to remove the driver, we firstly do stop
> streaming, which ensures that the worker has been canceled.
> I agree with your changes from the perspective of strengthening the
> robustness of the driver code.
>
> Regards,
> Kyrie.
> >
> > Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@...iatek.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 18:23写道：
> > >
> > > Dear Angelo and Zheng,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch and comments.
> > >
> > > Dear Kyrie,
> > >
> > > Please help to check this, thanks.
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 10:49 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > > wrote:
> > > > Il 07/03/23 10:27, Zheng Hacker ha scritto:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anyone who can help with this? I can provide more
> > > > > details
> > > > > like invoking chain if needed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Providing more details is always good. Please do.
> > > >
> > > > Meanwhile, adding Irui Wang to the loop: he's doing mtk-jpeg.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Angelo
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Zheng
> > > > >
> > > > > Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com> 于2023年3月6日周一 14:28写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In mtk_jpeg_probe, &jpeg->job_timeout_work is bound with
> > > > > > mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work. Then mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run
> > > > > > and mtk_jpeg_enc_device_run may be called to start the
> > > > > > work.
> > > > > > If we remove the module which will call mtk_jpeg_remove
> > > > > > to make cleanup, there may be a unfinished work. The
> > > > > > possible sequence is as follows, which will cause a
> > > > > > typical UAF bug.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fix it by canceling the work before cleanup in the
> > > > > > mtk_jpeg_remove
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CPU0                  CPU1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                      |mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work
> > > > > > mtk_jpeg_remove     |
> > > > > >    v4l2_m2m_release  |
> > > > > >      kfree(m2m_dev); |
> > > > > >                      |
> > > > > >                      | v4l2_m2m_get_curr_priv
> > > > > >                      |   m2m_dev->curr_ctx //use
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >   drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c | 2 +-
> > > > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git
> > > > > > a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > > > index 969516a940ba..364513e7897e 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > > > @@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ static int mtk_jpeg_probe(struct
> > > > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > >   static int mtk_jpeg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > >   {
> > > > > >          struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg =
> > > > > > platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > +       cancel_delayed_work(&jpeg->job_timeout_work);
> > > > > >          pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > > >          video_unregister_device(jpeg->vdev);
> > > > > >          v4l2_m2m_release(jpeg->m2m_dev);
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists