[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c1f57adbe0c4d48849d585508595939@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:07:54 +0000
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 02/14] iommufd: Add nesting related data structures for
ARM SMMUv3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgg@...dia.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2023 16:00
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>; Nicolin Chen
> <nicolinc@...dia.com>; robin.murphy@....com; will@...nel.org;
> eric.auger@...hat.com; kevin.tian@...el.com; baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com;
> joro@...tes.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> iommu@...ts.linux.dev; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; yi.l.liu@...el.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] iommufd: Add nesting related data structures
> for ARM SMMUv3
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 03:51:42PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> wrote:
>
> > > For ARM cases where there is no shared VMID space with KVM, the ARM
> > > VMID should be somehow assigned to the iommfd_ctx itself and the alloc
> > > domain op should receive it from there.
> >
> > Is there any use of VMID outside SMMUv3? I was thinking if nested domain
> alloc
> > doesn't provide the KVM instance, then SMMUv3 can use its internal VMID.
>
> When we talk about exposing an SMMUv3 IOMMU CMDQ directly to
> userspace then
> VMID is the security token that protects it.
>
> So in that environment every domain under the same iommufd should
> share the same VMID so that the CMDQ's also share the same VMID.
>
> I expect this to be a common sort of requirement as we will see
> userspace command queues in the other HW as well.
>
> So, I suppose the answer for now is that ARM SMMUv3 should just
> allocate one VMID per iommu_domain and there should be no VMID in the
> uapi at all.
>
> Moving all iommu_domains to share the same VMID is a future patch.
>
> Though.. I have no idea how vVMID is handled in the SMMUv3
> architecture. I suppose the guest IOMMU HW caps are set in a way that
> it knows it does not have VMID?
I think, Guest only sets up the SMMUv3 S1 stage and it doesn't use VMID.
Thanks,
Shameer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists