linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/19] Basic clock, reset & device tree support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09630acb-f1ae-4dbd-9c9c-9adb1743bfe4@spud>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:52:49 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
Cc:     Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/19] Basic clock, reset & device tree support for
 StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 05:49:48PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 01:36:41PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 01:28:01PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 06:08:53PM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> > 
> > > > The above two methods can fix the problem. Here are my test results.
> > > > The VisionFive board can boot up successfully if and only if all above
> > > > two applied.
> > > > The VisionFive 2 board can boot up successfully if I merge Linus's new
> > > > changes.
> > > 
> > > Tested also on my side. Hope this can be helpfull.
> > > 
> > > > Hope your fix will be merged in rc2. Thank you for your reply.
> > > 
> > > Fully agree.
> > 
> > If you only have a VisionFive 2, it shouldn't matter to you, as you
> > don't need to fix up any SiFive errata (at the moment at least).
> > Linus' fix is already in his tree, so should be in -rc2!
> > The fix for the VisionFive was applied to Palmer's RISC-V fixes tree
> > last night:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=bf89b7ee52af5a5944fa3539e86089f72475055b
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> 
> Hi Conor,
> Thanks for the info.
> Playing with this series I got the following error:
> 
> [    6.278182] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, udevd/136
> [    6.283414]  lock: 0xffffffd84135e6c0, .magic: ffffffff, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: -1
> [    6.291677] CPU: 0 PID: 136 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-g92569901a7f9-dirty #14
> [    6.299502] Hardware name: StarFive VisionFive 2 v1.3B (DT)
> [    6.305069] Call Trace:
> [    6.307517] [<ffffffff80005530>] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24
> [    6.312921] [<ffffffff80844b4e>] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
> [    6.317976] [<ffffffff8085032c>] dump_stack_lvl+0x3c/0x54
> [    6.323377] [<ffffffff80850358>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
> [    6.328429] [<ffffffff80845668>] spin_dump+0x64/0x70
> [    6.333394] [<ffffffff80058f26>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xb4/0xf2
> [    6.338970] [<ffffffff80857d04>] _raw_spin_lock+0x1a/0x22
> [    6.344370] [<ffffffff8008153c>] add_timer_on+0x8a/0x132
> [    6.349684] [<ffffffff8084b9fa>] try_to_generate_entropy+0x216/0x278
> [    6.356037] [<ffffffff804ebfdc>] urandom_read_iter+0x40/0xb8
> [    6.361697] [<ffffffff801a1216>] vfs_read+0x17e/0x1f8
> [    6.366752] [<ffffffff801a1986>] ksys_read+0x5e/0xc8
> [    6.371710] [<ffffffff801a19fe>] sys_read+0xe/0x16
> [    6.376503] [<ffffffff8000357a>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2
> [    6.381905] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000007
> [    6.390683] Oops [#1]
> [    6.392956] Modules linked in:
> [    6.396011] CPU: 0 PID: 136 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-g92569901a7f9-dirty #14
> [    6.403835] Hardware name: StarFive VisionFive 2 v1.3B (DT)
> [    6.409401] epc : enqueue_timer+0x1a/0x90
> [    6.413414]  ra : add_timer_on+0xe2/0x132
> [    6.417425] epc : ffffffff80080c60 ra : ffffffff80081594 sp : ffffffc8044dbc60
> [    6.424640]  gp : ffffffff814ffe50 tp : ffffffd8c171ad00 t0 : 6666666666663c5b
> [    6.431855]  t1 : 000000000000005b t2 : 666666666666663c s0 : ffffffc8044dbcc0
> [    6.439070]  s1 : ffffffc8044dbd08 a0 : ffffffd84135e6c0 a1 : ffffffc8044dbd08
> [    6.446284]  a2 : ffffffffffffffff a3 : 000000003e000000 a4 : 000000000000023e
> [    6.453498]  a5 : 000000000000023e a6 : ffffffd84135f930 a7 : 0000000000000038
> [    6.460712]  s2 : ffffffd84135e6c0 s3 : 0000000000000040 s4 : ffffffff81501080
> [    6.467926]  s5 : ffffffd84135e6c0 s6 : ffffffff815011b8 s7 : ffffffffffffffff
> [    6.475141]  s8 : ffffffff81502820 s9 : 0000000000000040 s10: 0000002ab0a49320
> [    6.482355]  s11: 0000000000000001 t3 : ffffffff81512e97 t4 : ffffffff81512e97
> [    6.489569]  t5 : ffffffff81512e98 t6 : ffffffc8044db948
> [    6.494875] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000007 cause: 000000000000000f
> [    6.502783] [<ffffffff80080c60>] enqueue_timer+0x1a/0x90
> [    6.508095] [<ffffffff8084b9fa>] try_to_generate_entropy+0x216/0x278
> [    6.514448] [<ffffffff804ebfdc>] urandom_read_iter+0x40/0xb8
> [    6.520107] [<ffffffff801a1216>] vfs_read+0x17e/0x1f8
> [    6.525160] [<ffffffff801a1986>] ksys_read+0x5e/0xc8
> [    6.530126] [<ffffffff801a19fe>] sys_read+0xe/0x16
> [    6.534918] [<ffffffff8000357a>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2
> [    6.540322] Code: 87b2 0813 0805 1613 0037 9832 3603 0008 e190 c211 (e60c) 5613
> [    6.547711] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [    6.552325] note: udevd[136] exited with irqs disabled
> [    6.557531] note: udevd[136] exited with preempt_count 2
> 
> 
> I'm working on top of Linux version 6.3.0-rc1-g92569901a7f.

Unfortunately, this g<sha> bit doesn't mean anything outside of your
repo so it's hard to infer anything from that.
This looks exactly like a bug is in v6.3-rc1, but Linus fixed in like
the second commit *after* -rc1.

What branch/commit/tag did you apply the series on top of?

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)