[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBsC+P=zvh6RF3UKiPnferUYU0QZvZfnn1oS5xWX-65Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 22:41:18 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/meson: fix missing component unbind on bind errors
Hi Johan,
thanks for your patch!
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 11:35 AM Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -325,23 +325,23 @@ static int meson_drv_bind_master(struct device *dev, bool has_components)
>
> ret = meson_encoder_hdmi_init(priv);
I'm wondering if component_bind_all() can be moved further down.
Right now it's between meson_encoder_cvbs_init() and
meson_encoder_hdmi_init(). So it seems that encoders don't rely on
component registration.
Unfortunately I am also not familiar with this and I'm hoping that
Neil can comment on this.
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists