[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7970fd0-ee6f-f1c1-e8c4-6ee42237a567@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:54:30 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, quic_cang@...cinc.com, mani@...nel.org,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, avri.altman@....com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] ufs: mcq: Add supporting functions for mcq
abort
On 3/9/23 14:47, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
> On 3/9/2023 10:15 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 3/8/23 21:28, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
>>> +static inline bool ufshcd_mcq_is_sq_empty(struct ufs_hw_queue *q)
>>> +{
>>> + return q->sq_head_slot == q->sq_tail_slot;
>>> +}
>>
>> Please remove this function and inline this function into its callers.
>
> Same comment. Should I also update the existing ufshcd_mcq_is_cq_empty()
> in a separate patch together with ufshcd_mcq_update_cq_tail_slot(),
> ufshcd_mcq_update_cq_head() mentioned above?
Hi Bao,
Modifying the existing code may improve uniformity of the UFS host
controller driver. If any existing code is refactored, please do that
via a separate patch.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists