[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1237665-60a6-97ec-3b9d-6067853aea48@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:56:24 -0800
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
<quic_cang@...cinc.com>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<stanley.chu@...iatek.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
<beanhuo@...ron.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] ufs: mcq: Add supporting functions for mcq
abort
On 3/9/2023 2:54 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/9/23 14:47, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
>> On 3/9/2023 10:15 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 3/8/23 21:28, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
>>>> +static inline bool ufshcd_mcq_is_sq_empty(struct ufs_hw_queue *q)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return q->sq_head_slot == q->sq_tail_slot;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Please remove this function and inline this function into its callers.
>>
>> Same comment. Should I also update the existing
>> ufshcd_mcq_is_cq_empty() in a separate patch together with
>> ufshcd_mcq_update_cq_tail_slot(), ufshcd_mcq_update_cq_head()
>> mentioned above?
>
> Hi Bao,
>
> Modifying the existing code may improve uniformity of the UFS host
> controller driver. If any existing code is refactored, please do that
> via a separate patch.
Thanks Bart. I will make that change in a separate patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists