[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e03134f9-9433-ab6b-170a-8ce752fccdeb@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:30:33 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
bin.liu@...iatek.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 1395428693sheep@...il.com,
alex000young@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: mtk-jpeg: Fix use after free bug due to uncanceled
work
On 3/8/23 19:58, Zheng Hacker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I think you're right. I don't know if there is
> other method to stop new work from enqueing. Could you please give me
> some advice about the fix?
>
Top-posting is discouraged.
Anyway -
I don't know the code well enough to suggest a solution.
It all depends on the driver architecture. The maintainers might
have a better idea.
A worse problem appears to be that the worker is also canceled
from mtk_jpeg_enc_irq() and mtk_jpeg_dec_irq(). Those are non-threaded
interrupt handlers which, as far as I know, must not sleep and thus
can not call cancel_delayed_work_sync(). I have no idea how to solve
that problem either.
Guenter
> Regards,
> Zheng
>
> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> 于2023年3月9日周四 08:27写道:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 05:37:15PM +0800, Zheng Wang wrote:
>>> In mtk_jpeg_probe, &jpeg->job_timeout_work is bound with
>>> mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work. Then mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run
>>> and mtk_jpeg_enc_device_run may be called to start the
>>> work.
>>> If we remove the module which will call mtk_jpeg_remove
>>> to make cleanup, there may be a unfinished work. The
>>> possible sequence is as follows, which will cause a
>>> typical UAF bug.
>>>
>>> Fix it by canceling the work before cleanup in the mtk_jpeg_remove
>>>
>>> CPU0 CPU1
>>>
>>> |mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work
>>> mtk_jpeg_remove |
>>> v4l2_m2m_release |
>>> kfree(m2m_dev); |
>>> |
>>> | v4l2_m2m_get_curr_priv
>>> | m2m_dev->curr_ctx //use
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
>>> index 969516a940ba..364513e7897e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
>>> @@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ static int mtk_jpeg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> static int mtk_jpeg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> -
>>> + cancel_delayed_work(&jpeg->job_timeout_work);
>>
>> The empty line is needed (coding style). Also, this doesn't cancel
>> the worker if it is already running. This should probably be
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(). Even then the question is if it is
>> possible that new work is queued before the device is unregistered.
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>> video_unregister_device(jpeg->vdev);
>>> v4l2_m2m_release(jpeg->m2m_dev);
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists