lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0261de31-e98b-85cd-80de-96af5a76e15c@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:07:04 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>, Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc:     chao@...nel.org, huyue2@...lpad.com, jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xiang@...nel.org, zhangwen@...lpad.com
Subject: Re: erofs: use wrapper i_blocksize() in erofs_file_read_iter()



On 2023/3/9 15:37, Yue Hu wrote:
> On Thu,  9 Mar 2023 15:15:15 +0800
> Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com> wrote:
> 
>>> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>>> 		if (bdev)
>>> 			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
>>> 		else
>>> -			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
>>> +			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;
>>
>> Since the mask is to be obtained here, is it more appropriate to use GENMASK(inode->i_blkbits - 1, 0)?
> 
> It should be another change independently to this patch. rt?

I'd suggest that keep to use (i_blocksize(inode) - 1) here, for example:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs.git/tree/fs/gfs2/bmap.c#n963

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
>>
>> Thx,
>> Yangtao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ