[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ddda680-b169-5105-a3cb-20790f0868ee@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:07:13 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm Secure
Execution Environment SCM interface
On 08/03/2023 16:06, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> On 3/7/23 16:36, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 05/03/2023 04:21, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>>> Add support for SCM calls to Secure OS and the Secure Execution
>>> Environment (SEE) residing in the TrustZone (TZ) via the QSEECOM
>>> interface. This allows communication with Secure/TZ applications, for
>>> example 'uefisecapp' managing access to UEFI variables.
>>>
>>> The interface is managed by a platform device to ensure correct lifetime
>>> and establish a device link to the Qualcomm SCM device.
>>>
>>> While this patch introduces only a very basic interface without the more
>>> advanced features (such as re-entrant and blocking SCM calls and
>>> listeners/callbacks), this is enough to talk to the aforementioned
>>> 'uefisecapp'.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Rebase ontop of latest qcom_scm changes (qcom_scm.h moved).
>>> - Move qcom_qseecom.h in accordance with qcom_scm.
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Bind the interface to a device.
>>> - Establish a device link to the SCM device to ensure proper ordering.
>>> - Register client apps as child devices instead of requiring them
>>> to be
>>> specified in the device tree.
>>> - Rename (qctree -> qseecom) to allow differentiation between old
>>> (qseecom) and new (smcinvoke) interfaces to the trusted execution
>>> environment.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
>>> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 15 +
>>> drivers/firmware/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/firmware/qcom_qseecom.c | 314 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom.h | 190 +++++++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 527 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/qcom_qseecom.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 9201967d198d..1545914a592c 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -17380,6 +17380,13 @@ F:
>>> Documentation/networking/device_drivers/cellular/qualcomm/rmnet.rst
>>> F: drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/
>>> F: include/linux/if_rmnet.h
>>> +QUALCOMM SECURE EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT COMMUNICATION DRIVER
>>> +M: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
>>> +L: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
>>> +S: Maintained
>>> +F: drivers/firmware/qcom_qseecom.c
>>> +F: include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom.h
>>> +
>>> QUALCOMM TSENS THERMAL DRIVER
>>> M: Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
>>> M: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +/* -- Platform specific data.
>>> ----------------------------------------------- */
>>> +
>>> +struct qseecom_data {
>>> + const struct mfd_cell *cells;
>>
>> The child qseecom devices are not platform devices, so MFD should not
>> be used here. Please use aux devices instead.
>
> Okay, makes sense. Would this still work with your suggestion in patch 4
> regarding a custom (?) bus or can the aux bus be used to implement that?
> From a
> quick look, I believe we could use aux bus for this but I haven't worked
> with
> that before, so I don't know if I'm missing something.
Initially I thought that a custom bus might be required, to provide
custom probe function. After giving it a thought, I think you can get
away with using aux bus. So, embed the struct auxiliary_device into
qseecom_app_device.
>
>>> + int num_cells;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id qseecom_dt_match[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,qseecom-sc8280xp", },
>>
>> Forgot to mention, while doign review. There is no need for this
>> compat until you provide the actual data. Please move it to the patch 4.
>
> Sure, will do that.
>
>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,qseecom", },
>>> + { }
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qseecom_dt_match);
>>
>>
>
> Regards,
> Max
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists