lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:57:32 +0800
From:   Gavin Li <gavinl@...dia.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, roopa@...dia.com,
        eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gavi@...dia.com, roid@...dia.com, maord@...dia.com,
        saeedm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v4 0/4] net/mlx5e: Add GBP VxLAN HW
 offload support


On 3/9/2023 4:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Gavin Li <gavinl@...dia.com>
>> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:22:36 +0800
>>
>>> On 3/8/2023 12:58 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Gavin Li <gavinl@...dia.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 17:19:35 +0800
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/6/2023 10:47 PM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Gavin Li <gavinl@...dia.com>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 05:02:58 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch-1: Remove unused argument from functions.
>>>>>>> Patch-2: Expose helper function vxlan_build_gbp_hdr.
>>>>>>> Patch-3: Add helper function for encap_info_equal for tunnels with
>>>>>>> options.
>>>>>>> Patch-4: Add HW offloading support for TC flows with VxLAN GBP
>>>>>>> encap/decap
>>>>>>>            in mlx ethernet driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gavin Li (4):
>>>>>>>      vxlan: Remove unused argument from vxlan_build_gbp_hdr( ) and
>>>>>>>        vxlan_build_gpe_hdr( )
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v2->v3
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Paolo Abeni
>>>>>>> - Add new patch
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>      vxlan: Expose helper vxlan_build_gbp_hdr
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v1->v2
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Alexander Lobakin
>>>>>>> - Use const to annotate read-only the pointer parameter
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>      net/mlx5e: Add helper for encap_info_equal for tunnels with
>>>>>>> options
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v3->v4
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Alexander Lobakin
>>>>>>> - Fix vertical alignment issue
>>>>>>> v1->v2
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Alexander Lobakin
>>>>>>> - Replace confusing pointer arithmetic with function call
>>>>>>> - Use boolean operator NOT to check if the function return value is
>>>>>>> not zero
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>      net/mlx5e: TC, Add support for VxLAN GBP encap/decap flows offload
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v3->v4
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Simon Horman
>>>>>>> - Using cast in place instead of changing API
>>>>>> I don't remember me acking this. The last thing I said is that in order
>>>>>> to avoid cast-aways you need to use _Generic(). 2 times. IIRC you said
>>>>>> "Ack" and that was the last message in that thread.
>>>>>> Now this. Without me in CCs, so I noticed it accidentally.
>>>>>> ???
>>>>> Not asked by you but you said you were OK if I used cast-aways. So I did
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>> change in V3 and reverted back to using cast-away in V4.
>>>> My last reply was[0]:
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>> You wouldn't need to W/A it each time in each driver, just do it once in
>>>> the inline itself.
>>>> I did it once in __skb_header_pointer()[0] to be able to pass data
>>>> pointer as const to optimize code a bit and point out explicitly that
>>>> the function doesn't modify the packet anyhow, don't see any reason to
>>>> not do the same here.
>>>> Or, as I said, you can use macros + __builtin_choose_expr() or _Generic.
>>>> container_of_const() uses the latter[1]. A __builtin_choose_expr()
>>>> variant could rely on the __same_type() macro to check whether the
>>>> pointer passed from the driver const or not.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> [0]
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc8/source/include/linux/skbuff.h#L3992
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc8/source/include/linux/container_of.h#L33
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> Where did I say here I'm fine with W/As in the drivers? I mentioned two
>>>> options: cast-away in THE GENERIC INLINE, not the driver, or, more
>>>> preferred, following the way of container_of_const().
>>>> Then your reply[1]:
>>>>
>>>> "ACK"
>>>>
>>>> What did you ack then if you picked neither of those 2 options?
>>> I had fixed it with "cast-away in THE GENERIC INLINE" in V3 and got
>>> comments and concern
>>>
>>> from Simon Horman. So, it was reverted.
>>>
>>> "But I really do wonder if this patch masks rather than fixes the
>>> problem."----From Simon.
>>>
>>> I thought you were OK to revert the changes based on the reply.
>> No I wasn't.
>> Yes, it masks, because you need to return either const or non-const
>> depending on the input pointer qualifier. container_of_const(), telling
>> this 4th time.
>>
>>>  From my understanding, the function always return a non-const pointer
>>> regardless the type of the
>>>
>>>   input one, which is slightly different from your examples.
>> See above.
>>
>>> Any comments, Simon?
>>>
>>> If both or you are OK with option #1, I'll follow.
> I'd like suggest moving on from the who said what aspect of this conversation.
> Clearly there has been some misunderstanding. Let's move on.
>
> Regarding the more technical topic of constness.
> Unless I am mistaken function in question looks like this:
>
> static inline void *ip_tunnel_info_opts(const struct ip_tunnel_info *info)
> {
>       return info + 1;
> }
>
> My view is that if the input is const, the output should be const;
> conversely, if the output is non-const then the input should be non-const.
>
> It does seem to me that container_of_const has this property.
> And from that perspective may be the basis of a good solution.
>
> This is my opinion. I do understand that others may have different opinions.
ACK

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ