linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: Add support for Intel LJCA device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:53:28 +0100
From:   Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To:     Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Tyrone Ting <kfting@...oton.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        zhifeng.wang@...el.com, wentong.wu@...el.com, lixu.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: Add support for Intel LJCA device



On 09.03.23 08:10, Ye Xiang wrote:

> +static int ljca_stub_write(struct ljca_stub *stub, u8 cmd, const void *obuf, unsigned int obuf_len,
> +			   void *ibuf, unsigned int *ibuf_len, bool wait_ack, unsigned long timeout)

Why do you make ibuf_len a pointer?

> +{
> +	struct ljca_dev *dev = usb_get_intfdata(stub->intf);
> +	u8 flags = LJCA_CMPL_FLAG;
> +	struct ljca_msg *header;
> +	unsigned int msg_len = sizeof(*header) + obuf_len;
> +	int actual;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (msg_len > LJCA_MAX_PACKET_SIZE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (wait_ack)
> +		flags |= LJCA_ACK_FLAG;
> +
> +	header = kmalloc(msg_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!header)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	header->type = stub->type;
> +	header->cmd = cmd;
> +	header->flags = flags;
> +	header->len = obuf_len;
> +
> +	if (obuf)
> +		memcpy(header->data, obuf, obuf_len);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&dev->intf->dev, "send: type:%d cmd:%d flags:%d len:%d\n", header->type,
> +		header->cmd, header->flags, header->len);
> +
> +	usb_autopm_get_interface(dev->intf);
> +	if (!dev->started) {

Memory leak in error case. You must free header.

> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto error_put;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> +	stub->cur_cmd = cmd;
> +	stub->ipacket.ibuf = ibuf;
> +	stub->ipacket.ibuf_len = ibuf_len;
> +	stub->acked = false;
> +	ret = usb_bulk_msg(dev->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe(dev->udev, dev->out_ep), header, msg_len,
> +			   &actual, LJCA_USB_WRITE_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +	kfree(header);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&dev->intf->dev, "bridge write failed ret:%d\n", ret);
> +		goto error_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (actual != msg_len) {
> +		dev_err(&dev->intf->dev, "bridge write length mismatch (%d vs %d)\n", msg_len,
> +			actual);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto error_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (wait_ack) {
> +		ret = wait_event_timeout(dev->ack_wq, stub->acked, msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			dev_err(&dev->intf->dev, "acked wait timeout\n");
> +			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;

If that triggers, you may have a pending URB.
You must kill it.

> +			goto error_unlock;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	stub->ipacket.ibuf = NULL;
> +	stub->ipacket.ibuf_len = NULL;
> +	ret = 0;
> +error_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
> +error_put:
> +	usb_autopm_put_interface(dev->intf);
> +	return ret;
> +}


> +static int ljca_i2c_stub_init(struct ljca_dev *dev, struct ljca_i2c_descriptor *desc)
> +{
> +	struct ljca_i2c_info *i2c_info;
> +	struct ljca_stub *stub;
> +	int ret;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	stub = ljca_stub_alloc(dev, LJCA_I2C_STUB, size_mul(desc->num, sizeof(*i2c_info)));
> +	if (IS_ERR(stub))
> +		return PTR_ERR(stub);
> +
> +	i2c_info = ljca_priv(stub);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < desc->num; i++) {
> +		struct mfd_cell cell = {};
> +
> +		i2c_info[i].ljca = &stub->ljca;
> +		i2c_info[i].id = desc->info[i].id;
> +		i2c_info[i].capacity = desc->info[i].capacity;
> +		i2c_info[i].intr_pin = desc->info[i].intr_pin;
> +
> +		cell.name = "ljca-i2c";
> +		cell.platform_data = &i2c_info[i];
> +		cell.pdata_size = sizeof(i2c_info[i]);
> +
> +		if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(ljca_acpi_match_i2cs))
> +			cell.acpi_match = &ljca_acpi_match_i2cs[i];
> +
> +		ret = ljca_add_mfd_cell(dev, &cell);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

What happens to stub in the error case?

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}


> +
> +static void ljca_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
> +{
> +	struct ljca_dev *dev = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> +
> +	ljca_stop(dev);

What prevents restarting the device here?

> +	mfd_remove_devices(&intf->dev);
> +	ljca_stub_cleanup(dev);
> +	ljca_delete(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int ljca_suspend(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t message)
> +{
> +	struct ljca_dev *dev = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> +
> +	ljca_stop(dev);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ljca_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
> +{
> +	struct ljca_dev *dev = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> +
> +	return ljca_start(dev);

So here you report errors, but at the same time you set "started"
even if errors occur.

	Regards
		Oliver