[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230309224451.13b9648b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 22:44:51 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUILD BUG v6.3-rc1] platform/x86/amd: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘amd_pmc_write_stb’
Someone on the linux-rt IRC channel complained of a build failure for
6.3-rc1-rt1, but investigating it further, the build failure exists in
6.3-rc1 vanilla.
With CONFIG_SUSPEND not defined I get:
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c: In function ‘amd_pmc_stb_debugfs_open_v2’:
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c:256:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘amd_pmc_write_stb’; did you mean ‘amd_pmc_read_stb’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
256 | ret = amd_pmc_write_stb(dev, AMD_PMC_STB_DUMMY_PC);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| amd_pmc_read_stb
I see in that file:
#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
{
[...]
}
#endif
And that commit b0d4bb973539 ("platform/x86/amd: pmc: Write dummy postcode
into the STB DRAM") adds a call to amd_pmc_write_stb() right were that
error is, without any protection against CONFIG_SUSPEND.
Try it! Build AMD/pmc.c without CONFIG_SUSPEND to enjoy the same build
message as I received.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists