lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAuPjCT/GGy860hW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 22:14:04 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
Cc:     Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.goran.todorovac@....hr>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>,
        Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
        Frederick Lawler <fred@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Add release hook to LSM

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 09:02:18PM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> On 10. 03. 2023. 20:47, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:42:00PM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> >>
> >> Add release() hook to the definition of the LSM modules, to enable calling
> >> destructors and deallocating allocated resources cleanly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
> > 
> >> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > I haven't given you this tag. Sorry, you must not add something
> > which was not explicitly given.

> This change could have long lasting consequences if approved, and I am not
> continuing the patch submission without your mentoring and approval.
> 
> It is true that I assumed that you have reviewed the patch, but you did not
> explicitly give the Reviewed-by tag.
> 
> But I am rather new to this patch submission process, and please would you
> please mentor me to do this the right way.

We have a nice documentation for that [1]. Please, read it in full.
If some questions left, do not hesitate to ask.

[1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ