linux-kernel - [PATCH] 9P FS: Fix wild-memory-access write in v9fs_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 00:26:19 +0400
From:   Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
To:     ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net, asmadeus@...ewreck.org,
        linux_oss@...debyte.com
Cc:     Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        himadrispandya@...il.com,
        syzbot+cb1d16facb3cc90de5fb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] 9P FS: Fix wild-memory-access write in v9fs_get_acl

KASAN reported the following issue:
[   36.825817][ T5923] BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in v9fs_get_acl+0x1a4/0x390
[   36.827479][ T5923] Write of size 4 at addr 9fffeb37f97f1c00 by task syz-executor798/5923
[   36.829303][ T5923]
[   36.829846][ T5923] CPU: 0 PID: 5923 Comm: syz-executor798 Not tainted 6.2.0-syzkaller-18302-g596b6b709632 #0
[   36.832110][ T5923] Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/21/2023
[   36.834464][ T5923] Call trace:
[   36.835196][ T5923]  dump_backtrace+0x1c8/0x1f4
[   36.836229][ T5923]  show_stack+0x2c/0x3c
[   36.837100][ T5923]  dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124
[   36.838103][ T5923]  print_report+0xe4/0x4c0
[   36.839068][ T5923]  kasan_report+0xd4/0x130
[   36.840052][ T5923]  kasan_check_range+0x264/0x2a4
[   36.841199][ T5923]  __kasan_check_write+0x2c/0x3c
[   36.842216][ T5923]  v9fs_get_acl+0x1a4/0x390
[   36.843232][ T5923]  v9fs_mount+0x77c/0xa5c
[   36.844163][ T5923]  legacy_get_tree+0xd4/0x16c
[   36.845173][ T5923]  vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x274
[   36.846137][ T5923]  do_new_mount+0x25c/0x8c8
[   36.847066][ T5923]  path_mount+0x590/0xe58
[   36.848147][ T5923]  __arm64_sys_mount+0x45c/0x594
[   36.849273][ T5923]  invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0
[   36.850421][ T5923]  el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258
[   36.851397][ T5923]  do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198
[   36.852398][ T5923]  el0_svc+0x58/0x168
[   36.853224][ T5923]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0
[   36.854293][ T5923]  el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194

Calling '__v9fs_get_acl' method in 'v9fs_get_acl' creates the
following chain of function calls:

__v9fs_get_acl
	v9fs_fid_get_acl
		v9fs_fid_xattr_get
			p9_client_xattrwalk

Function p9_client_xattrwalk accepts a pointer to u64-typed
variable attr_size and puts some u64 value into it. However,
after the executing the p9_client_xattrwalk, in some circumstances
we assign the value of u64-typed variable 'attr_size' to the
variable 'retval', which we will return. However, the type of
'retval' is ssize_t, and if the value of attr_size is larger
than SSIZE_MAX, we will face the signed type overflow. If the
overflow occurs, the result of v9fs_fid_xattr_get may be
negative, but not classified as an error. When we try to allocate
an acl with 'broken' size we receive an error, but don't process
it. When we try to free this acl, we face the 'wild-memory-access'
error (because it wasn't allocated).

This patch will modify the condition in the 'v9fs_fid_xattr_get'
function, so it will return an error if the 'attr_size' is larger
than SSIZE_MAX.

Reported-by: syzbot+cb1d16facb3cc90de5fb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=fbbef66d9e4d096242f3617de5d14d12705b4659
Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
---
 fs/9p/xattr.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/xattr.c b/fs/9p/xattr.c
index 50f7f3f6b55e..d6f7450107a8 100644
--- a/fs/9p/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/9p/xattr.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ ssize_t v9fs_fid_xattr_get(struct p9_fid *fid, const char *name,
 		return retval;
 	}
 	if (attr_size > buffer_size) {
-		if (!buffer_size) /* request to get the attr_size */
+		if (!buffer_size && attr_size <= (u64) SSIZE_MAX) /* request to get the attr_size */
 			retval = attr_size;
 		else
 			retval = -ERANGE;
-- 
2.34.1