[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2a51a0a63b7856794ac8fd6889ebf9fcb23f84e.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:46:26 +0000
From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>
To: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc: k4: Split out functions common with
M4 driver
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 12:04 -0600, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> On 3/2/23 11:14, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> > + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
> > + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
> > + * @ipc_only: flag to indicate IPC-only mode
> > + */
> > +struct k3_rproc {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct k3_rproc_mem *mem;
> > + int num_mems;
> > + struct k3_rproc_mem *rmem;
> > + int num_rmems;
> > + struct reset_control *reset;
> > + const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data;
> > + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> > + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> > + u32 ti_sci_id;
> > + struct mbox_chan *mbox;
> > + struct mbox_client client;
> > +};
> > +
> "ipc_only" mode element is missing in the structure.
That's added with the M4F driver in the next patch - it's not part of
the structure in the DSP driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists