lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:53:46 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
        Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc: k4: Split out functions common with M4
 driver

Il 10/03/23 10:46, Martyn Welch ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 12:04 -0600, Hari Nagalla wrote:
>> On 3/2/23 11:14, Martyn Welch wrote:
>>> + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
>>> + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
>>> + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
>>> + * @ipc_only: flag to indicate IPC-only mode
>>> + */
>>> +struct k3_rproc {
>>> +       struct device *dev;
>>> +       struct rproc *rproc;
>>> +       struct k3_rproc_mem *mem;
>>> +       int num_mems;
>>> +       struct k3_rproc_mem *rmem;
>>> +       int num_rmems;
>>> +       struct reset_control *reset;
>>> +       const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data;
>>> +       struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
>>> +       const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
>>> +       u32 ti_sci_id;
>>> +       struct mbox_chan *mbox;
>>> +       struct mbox_client client;
>>> +};
>>> +
>> "ipc_only" mode element is missing in the structure.
> 
> That's added with the M4F driver in the next patch - it's not part of
> the structure in the DSP driver.

Martyn, I get that it's added later, but the point here is that you are
documenting something that is missing! :-)

You should add the kerneldoc for @ipc_only: xxxx when you actually introduce
the new element... otherwise, this commit alone would trigger a kerneldoc warning.

Cheers,
Angelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ