[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d756429-13a5-f894-cf7d-b6f0f04da92c@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:53:46 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc: k4: Split out functions common with M4
driver
Il 10/03/23 10:46, Martyn Welch ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 12:04 -0600, Hari Nagalla wrote:
>> On 3/2/23 11:14, Martyn Welch wrote:
>>> + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
>>> + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
>>> + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
>>> + * @ipc_only: flag to indicate IPC-only mode
>>> + */
>>> +struct k3_rproc {
>>> + struct device *dev;
>>> + struct rproc *rproc;
>>> + struct k3_rproc_mem *mem;
>>> + int num_mems;
>>> + struct k3_rproc_mem *rmem;
>>> + int num_rmems;
>>> + struct reset_control *reset;
>>> + const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data;
>>> + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
>>> + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
>>> + u32 ti_sci_id;
>>> + struct mbox_chan *mbox;
>>> + struct mbox_client client;
>>> +};
>>> +
>> "ipc_only" mode element is missing in the structure.
>
> That's added with the M4F driver in the next patch - it's not part of
> the structure in the DSP driver.
Martyn, I get that it's added later, but the point here is that you are
documenting something that is missing! :-)
You should add the kerneldoc for @ipc_only: xxxx when you actually introduce
the new element... otherwise, this commit alone would trigger a kerneldoc warning.
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists