[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230310121602.109c58e7@xps-13>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:16:02 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/20] nvmem: layouts: sl28vpd: Add new layout driver
Hi Srinivas,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:03:45 +0000:
> On 08/03/2023 15:31, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > +
> > +static int __init sl28vpd_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return nvmem_layout_register(&sl28vpd_layout);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __exit sl28vpd_exit(void)
> > +{
> > + nvmem_layout_unregister(&sl28vpd_layout);
> > +}
> > +
> > +module_init(sl28vpd_init);
> > +module_exit(sl28vpd_exit);
> Looking at this pattern in two drivers, we could come up with some helper macro like.
>
> #define module_nvmem_layout_driver(__layout_driver) \
> module_driver(__layout_driver, nvmem_layout_register, \
> nvmem_layout_unregister)
Nice idea! I will make a patch; is it okay do it on top?
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists