[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e50790e-5b2d-4c5f-7a31-de71fa6cc967@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 03:08:48 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: use consistent name for
"group" variable
On 9.03.2023 16:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The set_mux callback in SoC TLMM driver (pinctrl-msm.c) uses "group",
> not "group_num" for the number of the pin group. Other places of
> lpass-lpi also use "group", so let's be consistent for code readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Konrad
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
> index 27fc8b671954..bd32556d75a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
> @@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ static int lpi_gpio_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> }
>
> static int lpi_gpio_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
> - unsigned int group_num)
> + unsigned int group)
> {
> struct lpi_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> - const struct lpi_pingroup *g = &pctrl->data->groups[group_num];
> + const struct lpi_pingroup *g = &pctrl->data->groups[group];
> u32 val;
> int i, pin = g->pin;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists