linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] kbuild: deb-pkg: default dpkg-buildpackage --build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <206b6c43-6e0f-777c-6da5-b8cf28c166a4@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:25:19 +0100
From:   Bastian Germann <bage@...utronix.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] kbuild: deb-pkg: default dpkg-buildpackage --build

Am 10.03.23 um 15:49 schrieb Bastian Germann:
> Am 10.03.23 um 15:37 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
>> If this patch is applied, 'make deb-pkg'
>> would not produce the source package at all.
> 
> How so? Are you saying `make deb-pkg` never built a source package with <= 6.2?
> Because those never specified a --build.
> 
>> Now I recalled the reason why I added this.
>>
>>
>>
>> dpkg-buildpackage(1):
>>
>>   full
>>       Builds everything.  This is an alias for source,any,all, and the
>>       same as the default case when no build option is specified.
>>                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> full is the default for --build. I guess the wording here is so tedious
> because you can have -S, -b, -B and so on which all imply some --build.
> 
>> NACK

I see. The option -nc implies -b. So yes, you are right.