linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] kbuild: deb-pkg: default dpkg-buildpackage --build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:49:53 +0100
From:   Bastian Germann <bage@...utronix.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] kbuild: deb-pkg: default dpkg-buildpackage --build

Am 10.03.23 um 15:37 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> If this patch is applied, 'make deb-pkg'
> would not produce the source package at all.

How so? Are you saying `make deb-pkg` never built a source package with <= 6.2?
Because those never specified a --build.

> Now I recalled the reason why I added this.
> 
> 
> 
> dpkg-buildpackage(1):
> 
>   full
>       Builds everything.  This is an alias for source,any,all, and the
>       same as the default case when no build option is specified.
>                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

full is the default for --build. I guess the wording here is so tedious
because you can have -S, -b, -B and so on which all imply some --build.

> NACK