linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: axis-fifo: remove tabs to align arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2303111104430.2802@hadrien>
Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 11:06:33 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@...il.com>
cc:     outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: axis-fifo: remove tabs to align arguments



On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, Khadija Kamran wrote:

> In file drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c, in line 386 and 529, last

last -> the last

> argument is indented as it were an argument of the second argument.

as it -> as if it

> Remove tabs to align the arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - Do not change the alignment of second argument
>  - Align arguments so last argument do not look like an argument of the
>    second argument.
>  - Fixed two instances of the same problem
>
>  drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
> index dfd2b357f484..fbb3ff59dc7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
> @@ -384,9 +384,9 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
>  		mutex_lock(&fifo->read_lock);
>  		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->read_queue,
>  			ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET),
> -				 (read_timeout >= 0) ?
> -				  msecs_to_jiffies(read_timeout) :
> -				  MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> +			(read_timeout >= 0) ?
> +			msecs_to_jiffies(read_timeout) :
> +			MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>
>  		if (ret <= 0) {
>  			if (ret == 0) {
> @@ -527,10 +527,10 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
>  		mutex_lock(&fifo->write_lock);
>  		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->write_queue,
>  			ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET)
> -				 >= words_to_write,

There is no need to change the above line.  Maybe one could argue that it
should be on the line before, but it is not part of the last argument of
wait_event_interruptible_timeout, so it should not be changed in this
patch.

julia

> -				 (write_timeout >= 0) ?
> -				  msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout) :
> -				  MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> +			>= words_to_write,
> +			(write_timeout >= 0) ?
> +			msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout) :
> +			MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>
>  		if (ret <= 0) {
>  			if (ret == 0) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>