linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 6/9] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Handle interface clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <544e6f22-f2f4-2c7c-1978-a96c9763e2ab@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:11:44 +0000
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/9] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Handle interface clocks

On 11/03/2023 00:54, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> - Update the commit log and potentially the structure comments
> I'm probably just very biased because I authored these commits, but I can't
> see which part is not clear.. Could I (and this is not passive-aggressive or
> anything) ask for a pointer there?
> 

I mean to say "non scaling clocks" isn't an indicator IMO of the fact 
that these are QoS node specific clocks.

Right now the interconnect model is predicated on bus and bus_a but, 
you've found that on some SoCs we have node-specific clocks too.

:g/non\ scaling/s//non-scaling\ node-specific/g

would do or "QoS node-specific" the fact the clocks don't scale is 
incidental the dependency though is that IMO at least these are 
additional node-specific clocks we need to enable.

---
bod