[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230313042848.bt4vl3tjjdb6qs34@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:58:48 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT
property presence
On 10-03-23, 08:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists