[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230313042914.jmbpmlfczad4epkv@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:59:14 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: Use of_property_present() for testing DT
property presence
On 10-03-23, 08:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/imx8mm_thermal.c | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists