[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230313042950.n5o3nufftybnbvbf@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:59:50 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property
presence
On 10-03-23, 08:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists