[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffaf4d60-f8d1-2456-88eb-8c91ed4a6b4a@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:43:38 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property
presence
Il 10/03/23 15:47, Rob Herring ha scritto:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> #
pcie-mediatek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists