[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e067d343-c47e-e2bf-4ae8-51873759d39b@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:44:24 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT
property presence
Il 10/03/23 15:47, Rob Herring ha scritto:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists