[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZA/zgYzmFxht0Kbz@chenyu5-mobl1>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:09:37 +0800
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@...ichuxing.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>,
Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>,
"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@...a.com>,
kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>,
"Arjan Van De Ven" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] sched/fair: Wake short task on current CPU
On 2023-03-14 at 08:43:17 +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Chenyu,
>
> I did not observe any regression when testing v6 :)
> Most of the benchmark results are comparable to the tip with minor
> gains in some benchmarks with single sender and single receiver.
>
> With the introduction of wakee_flips condition in is_short_task(),
> most benchmarks that have multiple tasks interacting are now
> comparable to tip. There may be other avenues for optimization
> using SIS_SHORT as Abel pointed but this series is a good start in
> that direction.
>
> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Thanks Prateek!
thanks,
Chenyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists