[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230314085741.6f968e68@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:57:41 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about the dependency on the config SOC_FSL in CPM_QMC
Hi Lukas,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:21:50 +0100
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> wrote:
> Dear Herve,
>
> In your patch below, you added the config CPM_QMC which depends on the
> non-existing config SOC_FSL:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230217145645.1768659-7-herve.codina@bootlin.com
>
> Up to my knowledge, the config SOC_FSL never existed in the mainline
> tree. Is this dependency really required or can the expression simply
> be reduced to COMPILE_TEST and we drop the dependency to SOC_FSL?
>
> Note: This patch has now shown up in linux-next with commit
> 3178d58e0b97. Currently, it would not be possible to compile test this
> driver, as the dependency on SOC_FSL is never met.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukas
My bad :(
The dependency must be FSL_SOC instead of SOC_FSL.
I mean:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/Kconfig
index f90cfdf0c763..7268c2fbcbc1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/Kconfig
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ config CPM_TSA
config CPM_QMC
tristate "CPM QMC support"
depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
- depends on CPM1 || (SOC_FSL && COMPILE_TEST)
+ depends on CPM1 || (FSL_SOC && COMPILE_TEST)
depends on CPM_TSA
help
Freescale CPM QUICC Multichannel Controller
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists