linux-kernel - Re: Question about the dependency on the config SOC_FSL in CPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 07:57:47 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
CC:     linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about the dependency on the config SOC_FSL in CPM_QMC

Hi Lukas

Le 14/03/2023 à 08:21, Lukas Bulwahn a écrit :
> Dear Herve,
> 
> In your patch below, you added the config CPM_QMC which depends on the
> non-existing config SOC_FSL:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230217145645.1768659-7-herve.codina@bootlin.com
> 
> Up to my knowledge, the config SOC_FSL never existed in the mainline
> tree. Is this dependency really required or can the expression simply
> be reduced to COMPILE_TEST and we drop the dependency to SOC_FSL?

That's a mistake, should be FSL_SOC.

See 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20230126083222.374243-7-herve.codina@bootlin.com/#3058690

Christophe