linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Fix "PMU event table sanity" for NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:43:24 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Fix "PMU event table sanity" for
 NO_JEVENTS=1

Em Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 09:58:16AM +0000, John Garry escreveu:
> On 08/03/2023 00:27, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > A table was renamed and needed to be renamed in the empty case.
> > 
> > Fixes: 62774db2a05d ("perf jevents: Generate metrics and events as separate tables")
> 
> This looks ok, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> But a comment, below.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >   tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c | 6 +++---
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c
> > index a938b74cf487..e74defb5284f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c
> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static const struct pmu_events_map pmu_events_map[] = {
> >   	},
> >   };
> > -static const struct pmu_event pme_test_soc_sys[] = {
> > +static const struct pmu_event pmu_events__test_soc_sys[] = {
> 
> Would it make sense or even possible to put these table names in macros in a
> common header?
> 
> Thanks,
> John
> 
> >   	{
> >   		.name = "sys_ddr_pmu.write_cycles",
> >   		.event = "event=0x2b",
> > @@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ struct pmu_sys_events {
> >   static const struct pmu_sys_events pmu_sys_event_tables[] = {
> >   	{
> > -		.table = { pme_test_soc_sys },
> > -		.name = "pme_test_soc_sys",
> > +		.table = { pmu_events__test_soc_sys },
> > +		.name = "pmu_events__test_soc_sys",
> >   	},
> >   	{
> >   		.table = { 0 }
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo