linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.278-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 07:32:16 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.278-rc1 review

On 3/15/23 05:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.278 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:57:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Building arm64:defconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_attach_lock':
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_online_cpus'; did you mean 'get_online_mems'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  2237 |         get_online_cpus();
       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |         get_online_mems
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_attach_unlock':
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_online_cpus'; did you mean 'num_online_cpus'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  2248 |         put_online_cpus();
       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |         num_online_cpus

This affects other architectures as well. Builds are not complete
so I don't see the full impact yet.

Guenter