linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.278-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e46d536-cc68-4b7c-e56e-cf1b94a925cb@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:44:59 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.278-rc1 review

Hello!

On 15/03/23 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.278 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:57:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.278-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Lots and lots of failures, mostly Arm.

For Arm, Arm64, MIPS, with GCC-8, GCC-9, GCC-10, GCC-11, GCC-12, Clang-16, for some combinations with:
* axm55xx_defconfig
* davinci_all_defconfig
* defconfig
* defconfig-40bc7ee5
* lkftconfig-kasan
* multi_v5_defconfig
* s5pv210_defconfig
* sama5_defconfig

-----8<-----
/builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_online_cpus' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
         get_online_cpus();
         ^
/builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:2: note: did you mean 'get_online_mems'?
/builds/linux/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:258:20: note: 'get_online_mems' declared here
static inline void get_online_mems(void) {}
                    ^
/builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_online_cpus' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
         put_online_cpus();
         ^
/builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:2: note: did you mean 'put_online_mems'?
/builds/linux/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:259:20: note: 'put_online_mems' declared here
static inline void put_online_mems(void) {}
                    ^
2 errors generated.
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:303: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o] Error 1
----->8-----


For Arm64, i386 x86, with GCC-11, Perf has a new error:

-----8<-----
In function 'ready',
     inlined from 'sender' at bench/sched-messaging.c:90:2:
bench/sched-messaging.c:76:13: error: 'dummy' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
    76 |         if (write(ready_out, &dummy, 1) != 1)
       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from bench/../perf-sys.h:5,
                  from bench/../perf.h:18,
                  from bench/sched-messaging.c:13:
----->8-----


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org