[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c34372d8-8166-6be6-b3a3-5214a2bae37a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:13:24 -0700
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
CC: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86: Update split lock documentation
Hi, Tony,
On 3/15/23 15:57, Tony Luck wrote:
> commit b041b525dab9 ("x86/split_lock: Make life miserable for split
> lockers") added a delay and serialization of cplit locks. Commit
s/cplit/split/
> 727209376f49 ("x86/split_lock: Add sysctl to control the misery mode")
> provided a sysctl to turn off the misery.
>
> Update the split lock documentation to describe the current state of
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> Documentation/x86/buslock.rst | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst b/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst
> index 7c051e714943..31ec0ef78086 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/buslock.rst
> @@ -53,8 +53,14 @@ parameter "split_lock_detect". Here is a summary of different options:
> |off |Do nothing |Do nothing |
> +------------------+----------------------------+-----------------------+
> |warn |Kernel OOPs |Warn once per task and |
> -|(default) |Warn once per task and |and continues to run. |
> -| |disable future checking | |
> +|(default) |Warn once per task, add a |and continues to run. |
> +| |delay, add synchronization | |
> +| |to prevent more than one | |
> +| |core from executing a | |
> +| |split lock in parallel. | |
> +| |sysctl split_lock_mitigate | |
> +| |can be used to avoid the | |
> +| |delay and synchronization | |
> | |When both features are | |
> | |supported, warn in #AC | |
> +------------------+----------------------------+-----------------------+
Other than the typo, looks good to me.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists