linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/104] 5.10.175-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c30fa569-91bf-619c-612f-1c796a61d1a4@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:17:25 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/104] 5.10.175-rc1 review

Hello!

On 15/03/23 06:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.175 release.
> There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:57:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Lots of failures here too.

For:
* ARC (allnoconfig)
* Arm (tinyconfig, footbridge_defconfig, multi_v5_defconfig-aa80e505, omap1_defconfig, sama5_defconfig)
* MIPS (tinyconfig, bcm63xx_defconfig, ath79_defconfig)
* PA-RISC (tinyconfig)
* PowerPC (allnoconfig, tinyconfig, tqm8xx_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig, ppc6xx_defconfig)
* RISC-V (allnoconfig, tinyconfig)
* SPARC (allnoconfig, tinyconfig)
* SuperH (allnoconfig, tinyconfig, dreamcast_defconfig, microdev_defconfig)
* x86 (allnoconfig, tinyconfig)

in combinations of GCC-8, GCC-9, GCC-11, GCC-12, Clang-16:

-----8<-----
In file included from /builds/linux/kernel/sched/core.c:13:
/builds/linux/kernel/sched/sched.h:2560:22: error: no member named 'cpu_capacity_inverted' in 'struct rq'
         return cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_capacity_inverted;
                ~~~~~~~~~~~  ^
----->8-----


For PowerPC (cell_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig, ppc6xx_defconfig, tqm8xx_defconfig) with GCC-8, GCC-12, Clang-16:

-----8<-----
/builds/linux/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c:1208:25: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NO_IRQ'; did you mean 'do_IRQ'?
         if (pinfo->port.irq == NO_IRQ) {
                                ^~~~~~
                                do_IRQ
----->8-----


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org