[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e31e32f0-86bf-4178-afad-b731ea49e673@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 07:46:49 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
"Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/38] ata: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, at 02:23, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 3/14/23 21:11, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
>> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
>> those drivers using them.
>
> I do not see HAS_IOPORT=y defined anywhere in 6.3-rc. Is that in linux-next ?
> There is a HAS_IOPORT_MAP, but I guess it is different.
It's defined in patch 1 of the series, so the later patches
can't be applied into subsystem trees without that.
We can either merge patch 1 as a preparation first, or keep it
all together as a series.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists