linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/38] ata: add HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:15:02 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/38] ata: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

On 3/15/23 15:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, at 02:23, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 3/14/23 21:11, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
>>> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
>>> those drivers using them.
>>
>> I do not see HAS_IOPORT=y defined anywhere in 6.3-rc. Is that in linux-next ?
>> There is a HAS_IOPORT_MAP, but I guess it is different.
> 
> It's defined in patch 1 of the series, so the later patches
> can't be applied into subsystem trees without that.
> 
> We can either merge patch 1 as a preparation first, or keep it
> all together as a series.

Got it. Either is fine with me. To allow option 2, I will send my ack.
Thanks !

> 
>       Arnd

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research