linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 4/7] pinctrl: qcom: Add IPQ9574 pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e482a189-823f-35b1-b411-4c4db22a86a6@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:52:39 +0530
From:   Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_poovendh@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 4/7] pinctrl: qcom: Add IPQ9574 pinctrl driver



On 3/8/2023 6:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:52 AM Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com> wrote:
>> On 3/7/2023 5:28 AM, andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> +    depends on OF
>>>
>>> No compile test on non-OF configurations?
> 
>> As per the generic convention followed in other
>> SoCs, we do not have compile test on non-OF configurations
> 
> Why not? So, you have to explain the deliberate narrowing of the test coverageOn adding 'depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST', the driver compiles
for non-OF configuration as well.
Will update this in the next spin!
> 
>>>> +    depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> +#define FUNCTION(fname)                                     \
>>>
>>> PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() ?
>> I see that there are quite a bunch of files that has to
>> be modified for using the generic data type and
>> macro for the pin function definition
>> We shall post a separate series to accommodate the changes
> 
> Sure, that's fine. Please do!
Sure, thanks
> 
>>>> +    [msm_mux_##fname] = {                           \
>>>> +            .name = #fname,                         \
>>>> +            .groups = fname##_groups,               \
>>>> +            .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(fname##_groups),  \
>>>> +    }
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> +#define PINGROUP(id, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8, f9)    \
>>>> +    {                                               \
>>>> +            .name = "gpio" #id,                     \
>>>> +            .pins = gpio##id##_pins,                \
>>>> +            .npins = (unsigned int)ARRAY_SIZE(gpio##id##_pins),     \
>>>
>>> Can you embed struct pingroup?
>> Will take care of this in a separate series
> 
> Ditto. Thanks!
Sure, thanks
> 
>>>> +    }
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> No MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()?
>> The MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipq9574_pinctrl_of_match) entry has
>> been added at the end of the file
> 
> So, you know what to do then to address my comment :-)
Yep, got it!
> 

Best Regards,
Devi Priya