[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462cee8c-c946-4483-98f0-cb8491d9a87c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:49:04 -0500
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: kernelci@...ups.io, rmoar@...gle.com,
"Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
"davidgow@...gle.com" <davidgow@...gle.com>,
"skhan@...uxfoundation.org" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"brendanhiggins@...gle.com" <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"guillaume.tucker@...labora.com" <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
"dlatypov@...gle.com" <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
"kunit-dev@...glegroups.com" <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [KTAP V2 PATCH] ktap_v2: add skip test result
On 3/16/23 06:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:45:29PM -0500, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
>> Yes, there is no need to do a single specification change that results
>> in incompatibility. But given the previous discussions there seem to
>> be plenty of other desired changes that will result in incompatibility.
>
> Do you have a pointer to that previous discussion?
There are links to a few threads at:
https://elinux.org/Test_Results_Format_Notes#KTAP_version_1
And I am tracking KTAP Specification version 2 activity in the
next section of that web page (not much yet, but hopefully
becoming more active).
-Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists