[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad7e6e40-6542-4439-8199-d46a6fc91364@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:33:45 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: kernelci@...ups.io, rmoar@...gle.com,
"Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
"davidgow@...gle.com" <davidgow@...gle.com>,
"skhan@...uxfoundation.org" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"brendanhiggins@...gle.com" <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"guillaume.tucker@...labora.com" <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
"dlatypov@...gle.com" <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
"kunit-dev@...glegroups.com" <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [KTAP V2 PATCH] ktap_v2: add skip test result
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:45:29PM -0500, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Yes, there is no need to do a single specification change that results
> in incompatibility. But given the previous discussions there seem to
> be plenty of other desired changes that will result in incompatibility.
Do you have a pointer to that previous discussion?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists