linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: Use generic ADC node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230316224450.onx2bldlisfwwp23@SoMainline.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:44:50 +0100
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        iio@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5: Use
 generic ADC node name

On 2023-03-16 17:44:28, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
<snip>
> > Should it inherit the common binding, or was it omitted for a reason?
> 
> Harmless but little point as far as I can see given we don't happen
> to have any of the generic elements defined in the generic channel
> binding.

Supposedly the reg property, and now also the node name.  Up to you to
say whether I should inherit this (and strip out the common bits) or
just focus on renaming the node name in the existing binding to channel.

- Marijn