[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b588f1e-ddd0-d7e7-984b-29e8be8f19ec@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:30:27 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Add new iommu op to get iommu hardware
information
On 2023/3/16 16:16, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> + * allocated in the IOMMU driver and the caller should free it
>> + * after use. Return the data buffer if success, or ERR_PTR on
>> + * failure.
>> * @domain_alloc: allocate iommu domain
>> * @probe_device: Add device to iommu driver handling
>> * @release_device: Remove device from iommu driver handling
>> @@ -246,11 +252,17 @@ struct iommu_iotlb_gather {
>> * @remove_dev_pasid: Remove any translation configurations of a specific
>> * pasid, so that any DMA transactions with this pasid
>> * will be blocked by the hardware.
>> + * @driver_type: One of enum iommu_hw_info_type. This is used in the
>> hw_info
>> + * reporting path. For the drivers that supports it, a unique
>> + * type should be defined. For the driver that does not support
>> + * it, this field is the IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT that is 0.
>> + * Hence, such drivers do not need to care this field.
> The meaning of "driver_type" is much broader than reporting hw_info.
>
> let's be accurate to call it as "hw_info_type". and while we have two
> separate fields for one feature where is the check enforced on whether
> both are provided?
>
> Is it simpler to return the type directly in @hw_info?
If I remember correctly, the vendor iommu type and hardware info are
reported to user space separately.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists