linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Add new iommu op to get iommu hardware information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:30:27 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        "eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
        "yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
        "peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
        "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com" 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        "lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
        "suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Add new iommu op to get iommu hardware
 information

On 2023/3/16 16:16, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> + *           allocated in the IOMMU driver and the caller should free it
>> + *           after use. Return the data buffer if success, or ERR_PTR on
>> + *           failure.
>>    * @domain_alloc: allocate iommu domain
>>    * @probe_device: Add device to iommu driver handling
>>    * @release_device: Remove device from iommu driver handling
>> @@ -246,11 +252,17 @@ struct iommu_iotlb_gather {
>>    * @remove_dev_pasid: Remove any translation configurations of a specific
>>    *                    pasid, so that any DMA transactions with this pasid
>>    *                    will be blocked by the hardware.
>> + * @driver_type: One of enum iommu_hw_info_type. This is used in the
>> hw_info
>> + *               reporting path. For the drivers that supports it, a unique
>> + *               type should be defined. For the driver that does not support
>> + *               it, this field is the IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT that is 0.
>> + *               Hence, such drivers do not need to care this field.
> The meaning of "driver_type" is much broader than reporting hw_info.
> 
> let's be accurate to call it as "hw_info_type". and while we have two
> separate fields for one feature where is the check enforced on whether
> both are provided?
> 
> Is it simpler to return the type directly in @hw_info?

If I remember correctly, the vendor iommu type and hardware info are
reported to user space separately.

Best regards,
baolu