[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276520530F017001340697B8CBD9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:08:25 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Add new iommu op to get iommu hardware
information
> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 4:30 PM
>
> On 2023/3/16 16:16, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> + * allocated in the IOMMU driver and the caller should free it
> >> + * after use. Return the data buffer if success, or ERR_PTR on
> >> + * failure.
> >> * @domain_alloc: allocate iommu domain
> >> * @probe_device: Add device to iommu driver handling
> >> * @release_device: Remove device from iommu driver handling
> >> @@ -246,11 +252,17 @@ struct iommu_iotlb_gather {
> >> * @remove_dev_pasid: Remove any translation configurations of a
> specific
> >> * pasid, so that any DMA transactions with this pasid
> >> * will be blocked by the hardware.
> >> + * @driver_type: One of enum iommu_hw_info_type. This is used in the
> >> hw_info
> >> + * reporting path. For the drivers that supports it, a unique
> >> + * type should be defined. For the driver that does not support
> >> + * it, this field is the IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT that is 0.
> >> + * Hence, such drivers do not need to care this field.
> > The meaning of "driver_type" is much broader than reporting hw_info.
> >
> > let's be accurate to call it as "hw_info_type". and while we have two
> > separate fields for one feature where is the check enforced on whether
> > both are provided?
> >
> > Is it simpler to return the type directly in @hw_info?
>
> If I remember correctly, the vendor iommu type and hardware info are
> reported to user space separately.
>
there is only one IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO cmd. It's written as:
data = ops->hw_info(idev->dev, &data_len);
copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(cmd->data_ptr), data, length);
cmd->out_data_type = ops->driver_type;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists