[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230316171010.7c51c93c@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 17:10:10 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, elder@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:43:05 -0500 Alex Elder wrote:
> Add support for SDX65, which uses IPA v5.0.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> ---
> v2: Add review tag; base on linux-next/master; drop "net-next" in subject
>
> It is my intention to have this patch be taken via the Qualcomm
> repository (not net-next).
That's a bit unusual, no strong feelings but why is that?
Bindings usually go with the code, ipa is a networking thing, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists