[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230317202748.7ctqhswettiemwi7@CAB-WSD-L081021>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:27:48 +0300
From: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
<martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
<kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <rockosov@...il.com>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: meson: add A1 PLL and
Peripherals clkcs bindings
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 01:53:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:48:25PM +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:28:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 13/03/2023 21:12, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > +#define CLKID_SPIFC 84
> > > > +#define CLKID_USB_BUS 85
> > > > +#define CLKID_SD_EMMC 86
> > > > +#define CLKID_PSRAM 87
> > > > +#define CLKID_DMC 88
> > >
> > > And what is here? Between 88 and 121?
> > >
> >
> > Explained below.
> >
> > > > +#define CLKID_GEN_SEL 121
> > > > +
> > > > +#endif /* __A1_CLKC_H */
> > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,a1-pll-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,a1-pll-clkc.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..8e97d3fb9d30
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,a1-pll-clkc.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> > >
> > > I found in changelog:
> > > "fix license issue, it's GPL-2.0+ only in the current version"
> > > and I do not understand.
> > >
> > > The license is wrong, so what did you fix?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry don't get you. Why is it wrong?
> > I've changed all new source files to GPL-2.0+ except yaml, because yaml
> > dt bindings schemas require the following license:
>
> Why 2.0+? The kernel's default license is 2.0-only. Are you (and
> your lawyer) okay with GPL v4?
>
> But this is still part of the DT binding and has the same license
> preference:
>
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>
> However, the header licenses are complicated due to .dts licenses which
> are all over the place. The requirement is dual licensed and matching
> what includes it.
Agree with you. As we discussed with Krzysztof, checkpatch must verify
such wrong license tags. I've introduced the patchset for that, please
take a look:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230317201621.15518-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru/
--
Thank you,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists