[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230317185317.GA2608140-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:53:17 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, jbrunet@...libre.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, jian.hu@...ogic.com,
kernel@...rdevices.ru, rockosov@...il.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: meson: add A1 PLL and
Peripherals clkcs bindings
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:48:25PM +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:28:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 13/03/2023 21:12, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > +#define CLKID_SPIFC 84
> > > +#define CLKID_USB_BUS 85
> > > +#define CLKID_SD_EMMC 86
> > > +#define CLKID_PSRAM 87
> > > +#define CLKID_DMC 88
> >
> > And what is here? Between 88 and 121?
> >
>
> Explained below.
>
> > > +#define CLKID_GEN_SEL 121
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* __A1_CLKC_H */
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,a1-pll-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,a1-pll-clkc.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..8e97d3fb9d30
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,a1-pll-clkc.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> >
> > I found in changelog:
> > "fix license issue, it's GPL-2.0+ only in the current version"
> > and I do not understand.
> >
> > The license is wrong, so what did you fix?
> >
>
> Sorry don't get you. Why is it wrong?
> I've changed all new source files to GPL-2.0+ except yaml, because yaml
> dt bindings schemas require the following license:
Why 2.0+? The kernel's default license is 2.0-only. Are you (and
your lawyer) okay with GPL v4?
But this is still part of the DT binding and has the same license
preference:
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
However, the header licenses are complicated due to .dts licenses which
are all over the place. The requirement is dual licensed and matching
what includes it.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists