[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167909163830.117471.962092693437106290.b4-ty@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:21:22 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Use of_property_present() for testing DT
property presence
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:36 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] rtc: sun6i: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
commit: 4d9890ac9d43d4dfd011110ab96633caa6fa829c
Best regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists